Using the ZF2 EventManager
Earlier this year, I wrote about Aspects, Intercepting Filters, Signal Slots, and Events, in order to compare these similar approaches to handling both asychronous programming as well as handling cross-cutting application concerns in a cohesive way.
I took the research I did for that article, and applied it to what was then a "SignalSlot" implementation within Zend Framework 2, and refactored that work into a new "EventManager" component. This article is intended to get you up and running with it.
Table of Contents
- Assumptions
- Terminology
- Getting Started
- EventCollection vs EventManager
- Global Static Listeners
- Listener Aggregates
- Introspecting Results
- Short Circuiting Listener Execution
- Keeping it in Order
- Custom Event Objects
- Putting it Together: A Simple Caching Example
- Fin
- Updates
Assumptions
You must have Zend Framework 2 installed either:
- From a development snapshot (the ZF2 blog has the latest links at the time of writing), or
- From cloning the ZF2 git repo
Terminology
- An Event Manager is an object that aggregates listeners for one or more named events, and which triggers events.
- A Listener is a callback that can react to an event.
- An Event is an action.
Typically, an event will be modeled as an object, containing metadata surrounding when and how it was triggered — what the calling object was, what parameters are available, etc. Events are also typically named, which can allow a single listener to branch logic based on the current event (though purists would argue you should never do this).
Getting Started
The minimal things necessary to get started are:
- An
EventManager
instance - One or more listeners on one or more events
- A call to
trigger()
an event
So, here we go:
use Zend\EventManager\EventManager;
$events = new EventManager();
$events->attach('do', function($e) {
$event = $e->getName();
$params = $e->getParams();
printf(
'Handled event "%s", with parameters %s',
$event,
json_encode($params)
);
});
$params = array('foo' => 'bar', 'baz' => 'bat');
$events->trigger('do', null, $params);
The above will output:
Handled event "do", with parameters {"foo":"bar","baz":"bat"}
Pretty simple!
Note: throughout this post, I use closures as listeners. However, any valid PHP callback can be attached as a listeners — PHP function names, static class methods, object instance methods, or closures. I use closures within this post simply for illustration and simplicity.
But what's that null
, second argument for?
Typically, you will compose an EventManager
within a class, to allow
triggering actions within methods. The middle argument to trigger()
is a
"context" or "target", and in the case described, would be the current object
instance. This gives event listeners access to the calling object, which can
often be useful.
use Zend\EventManager\EventCollection,
Zend\EventManager\EventManager;
class Example
{
protected $events;
public function setEventManager(EventCollection $events)
{
$this->events = $events;
}
public function events()
{
if (!$this->events) {
$this->setEventManager(new EventManager(
array(__CLASS__, get_called_class())
);
}
return $this->events;
}
public function do($foo, $baz)
{
$params = compact('foo', 'baz');
$this->events()->trigger(__FUNCTION__, $this, $params);
}
}
$example = new Example();
$example->events()->attach('do', function($e) {
$event = $e->getName();
$target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
$params = $e->getParams();
printf(
'Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s',
$event,
$target,
json_encode($params)
);
});
$example->do('bar', 'bat');
The above is basically the same as the first example. The main difference is
that we're now using that middle argument in order to pass a context on to the
listeners. Our listener is now retrieving that ($e->getTarget()
), and doing
something with it.
If you're reading this critically, you should have two questions:
- What is this
EventCollection
bit? - What is that argument being passed to the
EventManager
constructor?
The answer to the first will lead us into the second.
EventCollection vs EventManager
One principle we're trying to follow with ZF2 is the Liskov Substitution Principle. One typical interpretation of this is that strong interfaces should be defined for any class for which there could be a potential substitution, so that consumers may use other implementations without worrying about variances in internal behavior.
As such, we developed an interface, EventCollection
that describes an object
capable of aggregating listeners for events, and triggering those events.
EventManager
is the standard implementation we provide.
Global Static Listeners
One aspect that the EventManager
implementation provides is an ability to
interface with a StaticEventCollection
. This interface allows attaching
listeners not only on events, but on events emitted by specific contexts or
targets. The EventManager
, when notifying listeners, will also pull listeners
for the event from the StaticEventCollection
object it subscribes to, and
notify them.
How does this work, exactly?
At the application level, you grab an instance of StaticEventManager
, and
start attaching events to it.
use Zend\EventManager\StaticEventManager;
$events = StaticEventManager::getInstance();
$events->attach('Example', 'do', function($e) {
$event = $e->getName();
$target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
$params = $e->getParams();
printf(
'Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s',
$event,
$target,
json_encode($params)
);
});
You'll notice it looks almost the same as the original example. The only difference is there is a new argument at the beginning of the list, to which we attached the name 'Example'. This code is basically saying, "Listen to the 'do' event of the 'Example' target, and, when notified, execute this callback."
This is finally where the constructor argument of EventManager
comes into
play. The constructor allows passing a string, or an array of strings, defining
the name of the context or target the given instance will be interested in. If
an array is given, then any listener on any of the targets given will be
notified. Listeners attached directly to the EventManager
will be executed
before any attached statically.
So, getting back to our example, let's assume that the above static listener is
registered, and also that the Example
class is defined as above. We can then
execute the following:
$example = new Example();
$example->do('bar', 'bat');
and expect the following to be echo
'd:
Handled event "do" on target "Example", with parameters {"foo":"bar","baz":"bat"}
Now, let's say we extended Example
as follows:
class SubExample extends Example
{
}
One interesting aspect of our EventManager
construction is that we defined it
to listen both on __CLASS__
and get_called_class()
. This means that calling
do()
on our SubExample
class would also trigger the event we attached
statically! It also means that, if desired, we could attach to specifically
SubExample
, and listeners on simply Example
would not be triggered.
Finally, the names used as contexts or targets need not be class names; they can be some name that only has meaning in your application if desired. As an example, you could have a set of classes that respond to "log" or "cache" — and listeners on these would be notified by any of them.
At any point, if you do not want the EventManager
attached to a class to
notify statically attached listeners, you can simply pass a null
value to the
setStaticConnections()
method:
$events->setStaticConnections(null);
and they will be ignored. If at any point, you want to enable them again, pass
the StaticEventManager
instance:
$events->setStaticConnections(StaticEventManager::getInstance());
Listener Aggregates
Oftentimes, you may want a single class to listen to multiple events, attaching
one or more instance methods as listeners. To make this paradigm easy, you can
simply implement the HandlerAggregate
interface. This interface defines two
methods, attach(EventCollection $events)
and detach(EventCollection $events)
.
Basically, you pass an EventManager
instance to one and/or the other, and then
it's up to the implementing class to determine what to do.
As an example:
use Zend\EventManager\Event,
Zend\EventManager\EventCollection,
Zend\EventManager\HandlerAggregate,
Zend\Log\Logger;
class LogEvents implements HandlerAggregate
{
protected $handlers = array();
protected $log;
public function __construct(Logger $log)
{
$this->log = $log;
}
public function attach(EventCollection $events)
{
$this->handlers[] = $events->attach('do', array($this, 'log'));
$this->handlers[] = $events->attach('doSomethingElse', array($this, 'log'));
}
public function detach(EventCollection $events)
{
foreach ($this->handlers as $key => $handler) {
$events->detach($handler);
unset($this->handlers[$key];
}
$this->handlers = array();
}
public function log(Event $e)
{
$event = $e->getName();
$params = $e->getParams();
$log->info(sprintf('%s: %s', $event, json_encode($params)));
}
}
You would then attach it as follows:
$doLog = new LogEvents($logger);
$events->attachAggregate($doLog);
and any events it handles would then be notified when they are triggered. This allows you to have stateful event listeners.
You'll notice the detach()
method implementation. Just like attach()
, it
accepts an EventManager
, and then calls detach for each handler it has
aggregated. This is possible because EventManager::attach()
returns an object
representing the listener — which we've aggregated within our aggregate's
attach()
method previously.
Introspecting Results
Sometimes you'll want to know what your listeners returned. One thing to remember is that you may have multiple listeners on the same event; the interface for results must be consistent regardless of the number of listeners.
The EventManager
implementation by default returns a ResponseCollection
object. This class extends PHP's SplStack
, allowing you to loop through
responses in reverse order (since the last one executed is likely the one you're
most interested in). It also implements the following methods:
-
first()
will retrieve the first result received -
last()
will retrieve the last result received -
contains($value)
allows you to test all values to see if a given one was received, and returns simply a boolean true if found, and false if not.
Typically, you should not worry about the return values from events, as the object triggering the event shouldn't really have much insight into what listeners are attached. However, sometimes you may want to short-circuit execution if interesting results are obtained.
Short Circuiting Listener Execution
You may want to short-ciruit execution if a particular result is obtained, or if a listener determines that something is wrong, or that it can return something quicker than the target.
As examples, one rationale for adding an EventManager
is as a caching
mechanism. You can trigger one event early in the method, returning if a cache
is found, and trigger another event late in the method, seeding the cache.
The EventManager
component offers two ways to handle this. The first is to
pass a callback as the last argument to trigger()
; callback; if that callback
returns a boolean true, execution is halted.
Here's an example:
public function someExpensiveCall($criteria1, $criteria2)
{
$params = compact('criteria1', 'criteria2');
$results = $this->events()->trigger(__FUNCTION__, $this, $params, function ($r) {
return ($r instanceof SomeResultClass);
});
if ($results->stopped()) {
return $results->last();
}
// ... do some work ...
}
With this paradigm, we know that the likely reason of execution halting is due to the last result meeting the test callback criteria; as such, we simply return that last result.
The other way to halt execution is within a listener, acting on the Event
object it receives. In this case, the listener calls stopPropagation(true)
,
and the EventManager
will then return without notifying any additional
listeners.
$events->attach('do', function ($e) {
$e->stopPropagation();
return new SomeResultClass();
});
This, of course, raises some ambiguity when using the trigger
paradigm, as you
can no longer be certain that the last result meets the criteria it's searching
on. As such, my recommendation is you use one approach or the other.
Keeping it in Order
On occasion, you may be concerned about the order in which listeners execute. As an example, you may want to do any logging early, to ensure that if short-circuiting occurs, you've logged; or if implementing a cache, you may want to return early if a cache hit is found, and execute late when saving to a cache.
Each of EventManager::attach()
and StaticEventManager::attach()
accept one
additional argument, a priority. By default, if this is omitted, listeners get
a priority of 1, and are executed in the order in which they are attached. If
you provide a priority value, you can influence order of execution. Higher
priority values execute earlier, while lower (negative) values execute later.
To borrow an example from earlier:
$priority = 100;
$events->attach('Example', 'do', function($e) {
$event = $e->getName();
$target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
$params = $e->getParams();
printf(
'Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s',
$event,
$target,
json_encode($params)
);
}, $priority);
This would execute with high priority, meaning it would execute early. If we
changed $priority
to -100
, it would execute with low priority, executing
late.
While you can't necessarily know all the listeners attached, chances are you can make adequate guesses when necessary in order to set appropriate priority values. My advice is to avoid setting a priority value unless absolutely necessary.
Custom Event Objects
Hopefully some of you have been wondering, "where and when is the Event object
created"? In all of the examples above, it's created based on the arguments
passed to trigger()
— the event name, target, and parameters. Sometimes,
however, you may want greater control over the object, however.
As an example, as we've been developing the ZF2 MVC layer, we've been adding event awareness to several of the core MVC components. One thing that looks like a code smell is when you have code like this:
$routeMatch = $e->getParam('route-match', false);
if (!$routeMatch) {
// Oh noes! we cannot do our work! whatever shall we do?!?!?!
}
The problems with this are several. First, relying on string keys is going to very quickly run into problems — typos when setting or retrieving the argument can lead to hard to debug situations. Second, we now have a documentation issue; how do we document expected arguments? how do we document what we're shoving into the event. Third, as a side effect, we can't use IDE or editor hinting support — string keys give these tools nothing to work with.
Similarly, we found ourselves writing some wierd hacks around how we represent a computational result of a method when triggering an event. As an example:
// in the method:
$params['__RESULT'] = $computedResult;
$events->trigger(__FUNCTION__ . '.post', $this, $params);
// in the listener:
$result = $e->getParam('__RESULT__');
if (!$result) {
// Oh noes! we cannot do our work! whatever shall we do?!?!?!
}
Sure, that key may be unique, but it suffers from a lot of the same issues.
So, the solution is to create custom events. As an example, we have a custom "MvcEvent" in the ZF2 MVC layer. This event composes a router, route match object, request and response objects, and also a result. We end up with code like this in our listeners:
$response = $e->getResponse();
$result = $e->getResult();
if (is_string($result)) {
$content = $view->render('layout.phtml', array('content' => $result));
$response->setContent($content);
}
But how do we use this custom event? Simple: trigger()
can accept an event
object instead of any of the event name, target, or params arguments.
$event = new CustomEvent();
$event->setSomeKey($value);
// Injected with event name and target:
$events->trigger('foo', $this, $event);
// Injected with event name:
$event->setTarget($this);
$events->trigger('foo', $event);
// Fully encapsulates all necessary properties:
$event->setName('foo');
$event->setTarget($this);
$events->trigger($event);
// Passing a callback following the event object works for
// short-circuiting, too.
$results = $events->trigger('foo', $this, $event, $callback);
This is a really powerful technique for domain-specific event systems, and definitely worth experimenting with.
Putting it Together: A Simple Caching Example
In the previous section, I indicated that short-circuiting is a way to potentially implement a caching solution. Let's create a full example.
First, let's define a method that could use caching. You'll note that in most of
the examples, I've used __FUNCTION__
as the event name; this is a good
practice, as it makes it simple to create a macro for triggering events, as well
as helps to keep event names unique (as they're usually within the context of
the triggering class). However, in the case of a caching example, this would
lead to identical events being triggered. As such, I recommend postfixing the
event name with semantic names: "do.pre", "do.post", "do.error", etc. I'll use
that convention in this example.
Additionally, you'll notice that the $params
I pass to the event is usually
the list of parameters passed to the method. This is because those are often not
stored in the object, and also to ensure the listeners have the exact same
context as the calling method. But it raises an interesting problem in this
example: what name do we give the result of the method? I've standardized on
__RESULT__
, as double-underscored variables are typically reserved for the
sytem. If you have better suggestions, I'd love to hear them!
Here's what the method will look like:
public function someExpensiveCall($criteria1, $criteria2)
{
$params = compact('criteria1', 'criteria2');
$results = $this->events()->trigger(__FUNCTION__ . '.pre', $this, $params, function ($r) {
return ($r instanceof SomeResultClass);
});
if ($results->stopped()) {
return $results->last();
}
// ... do some work ...
$params['__RESULT__'] = $calculatedResult;
$this->events()->trigger(__FUNCTION__ . '.post', $this, $params);
return $calculatedResult;
}
Now, to provide some caching listeners. We'll need to attach to each of the 'someExpensiveCall.pre' and 'someExpensiveCall.post' methods. In the former case, if a cache hit is detected, we return it, and move on. In the latter, we store the value in the cache.
We'll assume $cache
is defined, and follows the paradigms of Zend_Cache
.
We'll want to return early if a hit is detected, and execute late when
saving a cache (in case the result is modified by another listener). As such,
we'll set the 'someExpensiveCall.pre' listener to execute with priority 100
,
and the 'someExpensiveCall.post' listener to execute with priority -100
.
$events->attach('someExpensiveCall.pre', function($e) use ($cache) {
$params = $e->getParams();
$key = md5(json_encode($params));
$hit = $cache->load($key);
return $hit;
}, 100);
$events->attach('someExpensiveCall.post', function($e) use ($cache) {
$params = $e->getParams();
$result = $params['__RESULT__'];
unset($params['__RESULT__']);
$key = md5(json_encode($params));
$cache->save($result, $key);
}, -100);
Note: the above could have been done within a
HandlerAggregate
, which would have allowed keeping the$cache
instance as a stateful property, instead of importing it into closures.
Sure, we could probably simply add caching to the object itself - but this approach allows the same handlers to be attached to multiple events, or to attach multiple listeners to the same events (e.g. an argument validator, a logger and a cache manager). The point is that if you design your object with events in mind, you can easily make it more flexible and extensible, without requiring developers to actually extend it — they can simply attach listeners.
Fin
The EventManager
is a powerful new addition to Zend Framework. Already, it's
being used with the new MVC prototype to empower some constructs that were
difficult to accomplish well in the version 1.X series — as an example, I was
able to prototype a ViewRenderer
replacement in a handful of lines of code, in
a way that properly accomplishes the separation of concerns one expects from
MVC. I anticipate we'll be using it much, much more often as version 2 matures.
There are certainly some rough edges — the boiler-plate code for short-circuiting is verbose, and we will likely want to add capabilities such as event globbing — but the foundation is solid and mature at this point in time. Experiment with it, and see what you can accomplish!
Updates
-
2011-10-06: Removed references to
triggerUntil()
, as that functionality is now incorporated intotrigger()
. Added section on Custom Event Objects.