Creating composite elements
In my last post on decorators, I had an example that showed rendering a "date of birth" element:
<div class=\"element\">
<?php echo $form->dateOfBirth->renderLabel() ?>
<?php echo $this->formText('dateOfBirth[day]', '', array(
'size' => 2, 'maxlength' => 2)) ?>
/
<?php echo $this->formText('dateOfBirth[month]', '', array(
'size' => 2, 'maxlength' => 2)) ?>
/
<?php echo $this->formText('dateOfBirth[year]', '', array(
'size' => 4, 'maxlength' => 4)) ?>
</div>
This has prompted some questions about how this element might be represented as
a Zend_Form_Element
, as well as how a decorator might be written to
encapsulate this logic. Fortunately, I'd already planned to tackle those very
subjects for this post!
The Element
The questions about how the element would work include:
- How would you set and retrieve the value?
- How would you validate the value?
- Regardless, how would you then allow for discrete form inputs for the three segments (day, month, year)?
The first two questions center around the form element itself: how would
setValue()
and getValue()
work? There's actually another question implied by
the question about the decorator: how would you retrieve the discrete date
segments from the element and/or set them?
The solution is to override the setValue()
method of your element to provide
some custom logic. In this particular case, our element should have three
discrete behaviors:
- If an integer timestamp is provided, it should be used to determine and store the day, month, and year
- If a textual string is provided, it should be cast to a timestamp, and then that value used to determine and store the day, month, and year
- If an array containing keys for date, month, and year is provided, those values should be stored
Internally, the day, month, and year will be stored discretely. When the value
of the element is retrieved, it will be done so in a normalized string format.
We'll override getValue()
as well to assemble the discrete date segments into
a final string.
Here's what the class would look like:
<?php
class My_Form_Element_Date extends Zend_Form_Element_Xhtml
{
protected $_dateFormat = '%year%-%month%-%day%';
protected $_day;
protected $_month;
protected $_year;
public function setDay($value)
{
$this->_day = (int) $value;
return $this;
}
public function getDay()
{
return $this->_day;
}
public function setMonth($value)
{
$this->_month = (int) $value;
return $this;
}
public function getMonth()
{
return $this->_month;
}
public function setYear($value)
{
$this->_year = (int) $value;
return $this;
}
public function getYear()
{
return $this->_year;
}
public function setValue($value)
{
if (is_int($value)) {
$this->setDay(date('d', $value))
->setMonth(date('m', $value))
->setYear(date('Y', $value));
} elseif (is_string($value)) {
$date = strtotime($value);
$this->setDay(date('d', $date))
->setMonth(date('m', $date))
->setYear(date('Y', $date));
} elseif (is_array($value)
&& (isset($value['day'])
&& isset($value['month'])
&& isset($value['year'])
)
) {
$this->setDay($value['day'])
->setMonth($value['month'])
->setYear($value['year']);
} else {
throw new Exception('Invalid date value provided');
}
return $this;
}
public function getValue()
{
return str_replace(
array('%year%', '%month%', '%day%'),
array($this->getYear(), $this->getMonth(), $this->getDay()),
$this->_dateFormat
);
}
}
This class gives some nice flexibility — we can set default values from our database, and be certain that the value will be stored and represented correctly. Additionally, we can allow for the value to be set from an array passed via form input. Finally, we have discrete accessors for each date segment, which we can now use in a decorator to create a composite element.
The Decorator
Revisiting the example from the last post, let's assume that we want users to
input each of the year, month, and day separately. PHP fortunately allows us to
use array notation when creating elements, so it's still possible to capture
these three entities into a single value — and we've now created a Zend_Form
element that can handle such an array value.
The decorator is relatively simple: it will grab the day, month, and year from the element, and pass each to a discrete view helper to render individual form inputs; these will then be aggregated to form the final markup.
class My_Form_Decorator_Date extends Zend_Form_Decorator_Abstract
{
public function render($content)
{
$element = $this->getElement();
if (!$element instanceof My_Form_Element_Date) {
// only want to render Date elements
return $content;
}
$view = $element->getView();
if (!$view instanceof Zend_View_Interface) {
// using view helpers, so do nothing if no view present
return $content;
}
$day = $element->getDay();
$month = $element->getMonth();
$year = $element->getYear();
$name = $element->getFullyQualifiedName();
$params = array(
'size' => 2,
'maxlength' => 2,
);
$yearParams = array(
'size' => 4,
'maxlength' => 4,
);
$markup = $view->formText($name . '[day]', $day, $params)
. ' / ' . $view->formText($name . '[month]', $month, $params)
. ' / ' . $view->formText($name . '[year]', $year, $yearParams);
switch ($this->getPlacement()) {
case self::PREPEND:
return $markup . $this->getSeparator() . $content;
case self::APPEND:
default:
return $content . $this->getSeparator() . $markup;
}
}
}
We now have to do a minor tweak to our form element, and tell it that we want to use the above decorator as a default. That takes two steps. First, we need to inform the element of the decorator path. We can do that in the constructor:
class My_Form_Element_Date extends Zend_Form_Element_Xhtml
{
// ...
public function __construct($spec, $options = null)
{
$this->addPrefixPath(
'My_Form_Decorator',
'My/Form/Decorator',
'decorator'
);
parent::__construct($spec, $options);
}
// ...
}
Note that I'm doing this in the constructor and not in init()
. This is for two
reasons. First, it allows me to extend the element later to add logic in init
without needing to worry about calling parent::init()
. Second, it allows me to
pass additional plugin paths via configuration or within an init
method that
will then allow me to override the default Date decorator with my own
replacement.
Next, we need to override the loadDefaultDecorators()
method to use our new
Date decorator:
class My_Form_Element_Date extends Zend_Form_Element_Xhtml
{
// ...
public function loadDefaultDecorators()
{
if ($this->loadDefaultDecoratorsIsDisabled()) {
return;
}
$decorators = $this->getDecorators();
if (empty($decorators)) {
$this->addDecorator('Date')
->addDecorator('Errors')
->addDecorator('Description', array(
'tag' => 'p',
'class' => 'description')
)
->addDecorator('HtmlTag', array(
'tag' => 'dd',
'id' => $this->getName() . '-element')
)
->addDecorator('Label', array('tag' => 'dt'));
}
}
// ...
}
What does the final output look like? Let's consider the following element:
$d = new My_Form_Element_Date('dateOfBirth');
$d->setLabel('Date of Birth: ')
->setView(new Zend_View());
// These are equivalent:
$d->setValue('20 April 2009');
$d->setValue(array('year' => '2009', 'month' => '04', 'day' => '20'));
If you then echo this element, you get the following markup (with some slight whitespace modifications for readability):
<dt id="dateOfBirth-label"><label for="dateOfBirth" class="optional">
Date of Birth:
</label></dt>
<dd id="dateOfBirth-element">
<input type="text" name="dateOfBirth[day]" id="dateOfBirth-day" value="20"
size="2" maxlength="2"> /
<input type="text" name="dateOfBirth[month]" id="dateOfBirth-month"
value="4" size="2" maxlength="2"> /
<input type="text" name="dateOfBirth[year]" id="dateOfBirth-year"
value="2009" size="4" maxlength="4">
</dd>
Conclusion
We now have an element that can render multiple related form input fields, and
then handle the aggregated fields as a single entity — the dateOfBirth
element will be passed as an array to the element, and the element will then, as
we noted earlier, create the appropriate date segments and return a value we can
use for most backends.
Additionally, we can use different decorators with the element. If we wanted to use a Dojo DateTextBox dijit decorator — which accepts and returns string values — we can, with no modifications to the element itself.
In the end, you get a uniform element API you can use to describe an element representing a composite value.